Search This Blog

Monday, 13 January 2025

The Vindication of Nietzsche by Aleister Crowley

The Vindication of Nietzsche

The Vindication of Nietzsche

The Giant’s Thumb

Aleister Crowley


All delicate days and pleasant, all spirits and sorrows are cast
Far out with the foam of the present that sweeps to the surf of the past:
Where beyond the extreme sea-wall, and between the remote sea-gates,
Waste water washes, and tall ships founder, and deep death waits:
Where, mighty with deepening sides, clad about with the seas as with wings,
And impelled of invisible tides, and fulfilled of unspeakable things,
White-eyed and poisonous-finned, shark-toothed and serpentine-curled,
Rolls, under the whitening wind of the future, the wave of the world.


It is eleven of the clock on the night of August 28, in the 1914th year of the Christian Era, and the news of the annihilation of the British Army has not yet reached London. It will come.1)

The cause is cant and hypocrisy, and the cause of the War was cant and hypocrisy, the strange, the pathetic, the craven determination to admit no fact for truth which all the men of science and all the poets of the reign of Queen Victoria did so little to shake. The demonstrations of Darwin and the sonorities of Swinburne reached only the thinking classes, if one may use so plural a noun for the remnant that refused to bow the knee to the Baal of Respectability and the Golden Calf of Commercialism.

Entrenched in the morass of bibliolatry, crouching in the bastions of Fort Grundy, the old Guard of Victorianism died and did not surrender. But as the Old Testament God fell before Paine and Ingersoll, as the sanguine and sacrificial Christ was emasculated by Renan and Edwin Arnold, the ruin of orthodoxy left even the manhood of Puritanism eunuch. Havelock with his bloody sword blowing 14,000 Sepoy prisoners from the muzzles of his guns in a morning became no longer thinkable. Hypocrisy surpassed itself, denounced its own virtues for vices. As the Goddess Reason once presided in Paris over panic, so the neuter deity Progress was worshipped by all those whom sloth, ease, security, prosperity had rotted. And the attendant demon-in-chief, Broken-Reed-in-Waiting to Its Majesty, was Humanitarianism.

We had Progressed. Lady Pyjama Noisette had a headache to the tune of a paragraph—10 lines. Sandsugar v. Sandsugar and Pintpot—a column. A piddling little quack doctor poisons his bitch of a wife and runs off with his fool of a typist—the business of the world is suspended until he is cinematographically hanged. A prominent writer calls attention to himself by the device of calling attention to the pangs of slaughtered oxen; another affirms his brotherhood with the Chicago Pig. Countless thousands turn Vegetarian, and then quarrel as to whether it is or is not True Vegetarianism to eat eggs. The war between the Fruitarians and the Nut-foodists nearly came to a cross word! I knew a “man” who refused to eat bread because it was a fermented drink! A friend of mine knew an Anarchist who refused cocoa because it excited his animal passions!


“And all the while the shark in southern seas!”


As the authoress of The Placid Pug so tragically counters.For there were one or two reprobates who happened to have read History, and to have observed Humanity. Of these Nietzsche was the chief. But even in England, independently of him, and ignorant of his teaching, was found a man who actually endeavoured—and, is still endeavouring2)—to found a New Religion on such texts as these:


“For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones.”

“But to love me is better than all things: if under the night-stars in the desert thou presently burnest mine incense before me, invoking me with a pure heart, and the serpent flame therein, thou shalt come a little to lie in my bosom. For one kiss wilt thou then be willing to give all; but who so gives one particle of dust shall lose all in that hour. Ye shall gather goods and store of women and spices; ye shall wear rich jewels; ye shall exceed the nations of earth in splendour and pride; but always in the love of me, and so shall ye come to my joy. I charge you earnestly to come before me in a single robe, and covered with a rich head-dress. I love you! I yearn to you! Pale or purple, veiled or voluptuous, I who am all pleasure and purple, and drunkenness of the innermost sense, desire you. Put on the wings, and arouse the coiled splendour within you: come unto me!

“At all my meetings with you shall the priestess say—and her eyes shall burn with desire as she stands bare and rejoicing in my secret temple—Tome! To me! calling forth the flame of the hearts of all in her love-chant.

“Sing the rapturous love-song unto me! Burn to me perfumes! Wear to me jewels! Drink to me, for I love you! I love you!

“I am the blue-lidded daughter of Sunset; I am the naked brilliance of the voluptuous night-sky.

“To me! To me!”


“These are dead, these fellows; they feel not. We are not for the poor and for the sad; the lords of the earth are our kinsfolk.

“Is a God to live in a dog? No! but the highest are of us. They shall rejoice, our chosen: who sorroweth is not of us.

“Beauty and strength, leaping laughter and delicious languor, force and fire, are of us.

“We have nothing with the outcast and the unfit: let them die in their misery. For they feel not. Compassion is the vice of kings: stamp down the wretched and the weak: this is the law of the strong: this is our law and the joy of the world. Think not, O king, upon that lie: That Thou Must Die: verily thou shalt not die, but live. Now let it be understood: if the body of the King dissolve, he shall remain in pure ecstasy for ever. Nuit! Hadit! Ra-Hoor-Khuit! The Sun, Strength and Sight, Light; these are for the servants of the Star and the Snake.

“I am the Snake that giveth Knowledge and Delight and bright glory, and stir the hearts of men with drunkenness. To worship me take wine and strange drugs whereof I will tell my prophet, and be drunk thereof! They shall not harm ye at all. It is a lie, this folly against self. The exposure of innocence is a lie. Be strong, man! lust, enjoy all things of sense and rapture:fear not that any God shall deny thee for this.”


“Ye are against the people, O my chosen!

“If Will stops and cries Why, invoking Because, then Will stops and does nought.

“If Power asks Why, then is Power weakness.”

“Pity not the fallen! I never knew them. I am not for them. I console not: I hate the consoled and the consoler.”


“There is a veil; that veil is black. It is the veil of the modest woman; it is the veil of sorrow, and the pall of death: this is none of me. Teardown that lying spectre of the centuries: veil not your vices in virtuous words: the services are my services; ye do well, and I will reward you here and here after.”


“Beware therefore! Love all, lest perchance is a King concealed! Say you so? Fool! If he be a King, thou canst not hurt him.

“Therefore strike hard and low, and to hell with them, master!”


“Now let it be first understood that I am a god of War and of Vengeance. I shall deal hardly with them.

“Choose ye an island!

“Fortify it!

“Dung it about with enginery of war!

“I will give you a war-engine.

“With it ye shall smite the peoples; and none shall stand before you.”


“Worship me with fire and blood; worship me with swords and withs pears. Let the woman be girt with a sword before me: let blood flow to my name.Trample down the Heathen: be upon them, O warrior, I will give you of their flesh to eat!”

“Mercy let be off: damn them who pity! Kill and torture; spare not; be upon them!

“Them that seek to entrap thee, to overthrow thee, them attack without pity or quarter; and destroy them utterly. Swift as a trodden serpent turn and strike! Be thou yet deadlier than he! Drag down their souls to awful torment: laugh at their fear: spit upon them!”


“I am in a secret fourfold word, the blasphemy against all gods of men.

“Curse them! Curse them! Curse them!

“With my Hawk’s head I peck at the eyes of Jesus as he hangs upon the cross.

“I flap my wings in the face of Mohammed and blind him.

“With my claws I tear out the flesh of the Indian and the Buddhist, Mongol and Din.

“Bahlasti! Ompehda! I spit on your crapulous creeds.

“Let Mary inviolate be torn upon wheels: for her sake let all chaste women be utterly despised among you!

“Also for beauty’s sake and love’s!

“Despise also all cowards; professional soldiers who dare not fight, but play: all fools despise!

“But the keen and the proud, the royal and the lofty: ye are brothers!”As brothers fight ye!”


“There is no law beyond Do what thou wilt.”


This is plain speaking; this is “blasphemy” and “immorality” if ever such were spoken.

I quote it in preference to Nietzsche, not only because Nietzsche has penetrated from Prussia to Pimlico, and is quoted in Streatham as in Stuttgart, but also because it is simpler than Nietzsche, because there is no possibility of misinterpreting the doctrine (were I dowered with a double portion of the Spirit of Escobar), because it is not German or Slavonic but universal, the battle-cry of what may yet become a new and terrible theocracy. Its adherents have hitherto been secret; to-day they surely lift their heads; to-morrow they may reap the reward of having thought ten years ago what England thinks this year.

It is only two months since even the saner sections of the people were disputing hotly as to whether boxing is “brutal”; and this month no man of sense but admits that little children may lawfully be pitched into blazing cottages before their mothers’ eyes. And that is play to what may come. Will not human flesh be bought and sold in the markets before the war and its attendant revolutions are over? Is there any man bold enough to call such things “impossible,” to invoke those fallen fishy gods “Progress” and “Civilization” and “The Higher Awakening of the Ethical Instincts of man?”

Is there any man who still shuts his eyes to the plain fact that homo sapiens is but a primate, cousin of the gorilla, with a brain over-developed to think abominations, and a larynx evolved to aid their execution, a creature whose prime pangs are hunger, lust, and hate, and his fundamental solaces rape, robbery, and murder? I laughed with open throat at the “atrocity” Press Campaigns in the Balkan War. “The half-civilized peoples of the Near East!” Is the present war any less prolific of such stories when the compatriots of Tolstoi, and Gorky, and Goethe, and Anatole France, and Shelley are at war?And are the stories true? True or false in detail, I knew them true in essence, and I knew also that the primmest old maid in Dorchester whose palsied hands dropped her knitting as she read of them was horrified because, although she did not know it, and could never be brought to know it, those atrocities were in her blood from everlasting. “There, but for the Grace of God, goes Charles Baxter” was the wisest remark that ever came from a fool’s lips. And it is because we have persuaded ourselves bitterly and obstinately, against the deeper knowledge that is instinct in every organism, that these things cannot happen, that we have lost the manhood that could have prevented them. Some there are so priggishly purblind that fact itself, naked and bleeding at their thresholds, battering on the gates of their ears with the Ram of actuality, fails to force those waxed-up tympana. When the nations were already at each other’s throats, when men had seen their brothers blown to atoms before their eyes, drilled through with nickel and lead, slashed and gashed with steel, ridden down beneath the hoofs of the horses,3) we heard that President Wilson had offered to arbitrate! To arbitrate, when the diplomatic and economic pressure of a decade, and the consciousness of ineradicable race-hatred since time began, and clan tore clan with flint, had forced the Boar of Germany to turn at last upon the Borzoi and the Bulldog, to lash out with tush and hoof at the invisible pack of hounds that closed upon him.

And we are still babbling of the Cause of Liberty, and the Banner of the Democracies, and the Truth, and the Righteousness, and the Justice, and the Equality, and the Humanity, and the Progress, when every man that is not stultified beyond the surgery of war by his own hypocrisies, knows well that the battle is a battle of over-population, the hæmorrhage of a plethora, and that its terms are merely “My life or yours!”—”The hammer or the anvil?”

The Chinese (till Europe infected them) murdered all but a few selected female infants, and consequently lived in peace and prosperity for two thousand years. Civilization and the arts flourished: famine was rare, and floods and plague were welcomed as a purge.4) Our squeamishness has forbidden us to take this elementary precaution, this restraint imposed on prosperity by wisdom; and where are our civilization, our prosperity, our liberty, our Progress? In fifty years will there remain so many monuments of what we were two months ago as Egypt has of its Pharaohs, Greece of its Republics, Rome of its Cæsars? We have used bricks and iron for stone and brass, pulp for papyrus and palm-leaf, rhetoric for fact, pharisaism for publicanism, and our era will perish ere our own bones rot!5)

We have pretended6) that there was no such thing as sex, no such thing as venereal disease, that our publicists were True Believers in Christianity, that our women were pure and our men brave; we have howled down every man who dared to hint the truth: we have sowed the wind of pious phrases, and we must reap the whirlwind of war. It has been the same in every drawer of our cupboard—and now the skeleton is out. Swinburne’s prophecy has come true; we must amend him to read:


“They are past, and their places are taken,
The gods and the priests that are pure.”


We have a credit system which when analysed meant that we were all pretending to be rich, a social system in which we all pretended to be esquires at the least. We had Dukes who never led, Marquesses with no marches to ward, Knights who could barely sit a donkey; we called our slattern slaves lady helps, our prostitutes soiled doves, our grumbling mumbling fumbling politicians statesmen.

And it is gone like a ghost—and an unclean spirit sure it was that haunted us.


And if I write for England, who will read?
As if, when moons of Ramazan recede,
Some fatuous angel-porter should deposit
His perfect wine within the privy closet!
“What do they know, who only England know?”
Only what England paints its face to show.
Love mummied and relabelled “chaste affection,”
And lust excused as “natural selection”.

*      *       *      *       *

Caligula upbraids the cruel cabby,
And Nero birches choir-boys in the Abbey;
Semiramis sand-papered to a simper,
And Clytemnæstra whittled to a whimper!
The austerities of Loyola? to seek!
But—let us have a “self-denial week”!
The raptures of Teresa are hysteric;
But—let us giggle at some fulsome cleric!
“The age refines! You lag behind.” God knows!
Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

*      *       *      *       *

To call forced labour slavery is rude,
“Terminological inexactitude.”
This from the masters of the winds and waves
Whose cotton-mills are crammed with British slaves!
Men pass their nights with German-Jewish whores,
Their days in keeping “aliens” from our shores.
They turn their eyes up at a Gautier’s tale,
And run a maisonette in Maida Vale.

*      *       *      *       *

Your titles—oh! how proud you are to wear them?
—What about “homo quatuor literarum?”
The puissant all their time to vice devote;
The impotent (contented) pay to gloat.
The strumpet’s carwheels splash the starving maiden
In Piccadilly, deadlier than Aden.
“England expects a man to do his duty.”
He calls truth lies, and sneers at youth and beauty,
Pays cash for love and fancies he has won it—
Duty means church, where he thanks God he’s done it!


I wish I could quote the whole poem;7) but it may need another six months before prudery has a final “seizure.”8)

It is this prudery which has fought Nietzsche. In its last ditch it is still pretending that Nietzsche, who hated the Germans, was a German. “The Anglo-Nietzschean War!” True it is, the Germans were the only people who had the common sense, the clear sight, the ability to face, grasp and use the facts whichNietzsche thundered to the planet. Had England done so, she would have had two million men always under arms, and Germany must have surrendered without a blow, could never have dared even this desperate dash, this madness which comes of pushing sanity to the wall, and bidding it fight for its life. Nor could I write that the British army: has been, is being, or is about to be } annihilated.

Are we fighting to preserve peace, to hold the balance of power, to save civilization, to relieve the burden of armaments, to smash the tyranny of militarism, to sentinel liberty?Then we should have had an army equal to Germany’s, and our fleet should have destroyed hers while we were three to one. You must fight fire with fire. Shelley’s “Laon and Cythna” and his “Masque of Anarchy,” Tolstoi and the whole school of non-resistance, where are they now? The “big blonde beast”who visits women with a whip under his arm has not been impressed with the moral superiority of the conquered. He has robbed them and enslaved them and murdered them, he has ravished their women and tossed their children on his bayonets, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, Amen. Thus spake Zarathustra. Oh rapture! Font of Medea! Baptism of Rejuvenation! The old world is bathed again in blood; its limbs glow with the crimson; it is the angry sunrise of a new æon, and Apollo shakes himself clear of the dawn-mists,Nietzsche his morning star!The grey breaks to gold.Is it not written in the Seventh Incantation of the Book of LIBER VII: (that is of Lapis Lazuli) by Him that is I:—


“The forest of the spears of the Most High is called Night, and Hades, and the Day of Wrath; but I am His captain, and I bear His cup.

“Fear me not with my spearmen! They shall slay the demons with their petty prongs. Ye shall be free.

“Ah, slaves! ye will not—ye know not how to will.

“Yet the music of my spears shall be a song of freedom.”


“O my God, but the love in Me bursts over the bonds of Space and Time; my love is split among them that love not love.

“My wine is poured out for them that never tasted wine.

“The fumes thereof shall intoxicate them, and the vigour of my love shall breed mighty children from their maidens.”


Is not Earth purged? Is not the Pillar established in the Void? Παμφαγε, Πανγενετωρ! Thou art arisen! Is there not an end of the anæmia of the Humanitarian, and the hysteria of the Suffragist, and the stark cunning lunacy of the Cubist-Futurist-Vorticist-Parallelipipedist-Feminist, and all the onanism of the Knut and the Flapper?

Will not man arise again, and hunt and fight and master his mate, and will not woman return to her cooking and her housewifery and the breeding of lusty children to her man? And if Nietzsche be the dawn-star, shall there be no son of man to be a Sun of men?

Had we no prophet? Had we no poet, O all ye weary criticasters of the prostitute-prude Press?

Was there not one to put into the mouth of his king-priest-magus, baffled by fate in the hour of the birth of Christianity, this prophecy of the Antichrist9)

Listen!


“I will away
Into the mystic palaces of Pan;
Hidden from day,
Hidden from Man,
Awaiting there the coming of the Sphinx
Whose genius drinks
The poison of this pestilence, and saves
The world from all its lords and slaves.
Ho! for his chariot-wheels that whirl afar!
His hawk’s eye flashing through the silver star!
Upon the heights his standard shall he plant,
Free, equal, passionate, pagan, dominant,
Mystic, indomitable, self-controlled,
The red rose glowing on the cross of gold…
Yea! I will wait throughout the centuries
Of the universal man-disease
Until that morn of his Titanic birth…
The Saviour of the Earth!”

*      *       *      *       *

It is nine years—nearly ten—since I wrote this Essay—a spasm of royal Rapture enkindled by the Spark struck from the steel of the Sword by the Flint of Fate—at the word War my Soul leapt singing unto the Sunlight. My life for England, and to win the World! So, die I did, not once but many and many a time in these strange years. No stranger years were ever written upon the scroll of Thoth! All values have changed & changed and changed again; dark and tempestuous have rolled the thunderclouds of Fact, and the Föhn of abject Fear has blown out almost every lamp of Truth, and whistles louder lies than ever was known; but the Earth rolls Sunward, Light pierces,Night is daunted, and her ministers are understood to have been shadow-phantoms imagined by Ignorance and Superstition. “Do what thou wilt!” has been pro-claimed to many a million; and myself, the Prophet of that Law, made manifest to men as being indeed The Great Wild Beast. Already they have learnt to hate, fear, shun, and drive me forth: the hour is even now at hand when“the keen and the proud, the royal and the lofty” begin to accept my Law as the touchstone of Kingship, to come to me, saying: We “worship thy name, foursquare, mystic, wonderful, the number of the man”—“blessing and worship to the prophet of the lovely Star”. For I am Man himself, the avatar of his Solar and Royal essence: Light, Life, Love, Liberty being the functions of my true Self, whose Word is Θελημα. For this is “The end of the hiding of Hadit”, the realization in consciousness of his bornless Sovereignty, that is the opening of the Aeon of the Crowned and Conquering Child for every Man that Will; and the manifest token of his lordship is his fearless frankness in adherence to my Law, his Oath of Fealty to me as ‘the priest of the princes’, the Prophet in whose Word is his Energy & his Authority, The Beast of whose Solar Substance he shall build the Temple of deathless and impregnable Beauty, to the Child his God and King. For his light is in me &its red flame is as a sword in my hand to push His order: so that tome His Holy Chosen One, from whom all Lordship is derived, shouldst every Lord and King pay tribute of Truth, ranging himself beneath my Banner of Love under Will, as Warrior Lawgiver of the Hosts of Light.




1) 
P. S. It came; and was censored. But England will yet find out.
P. P. S. It was not until after Victory had been proclaimed that men began to realize that it was Defeat. For the corruption of Christianity made them cowards even in conquest, refusing to assume the responsibility of Mastership.
2) 
P. S. Dec. 1923 E. V. He has perdured with dogged dauntlessness through distress and disaster of every kind: and his Truth is subtly infiltrating the whole Body of the World’s Thought, Every year marks an advance—irrefutable & automatic—towards acceptation.
The quotations are from Liber AL the "Book of the Law". Vide The Equinox I VII & X et al.
3) 
Note the date of writing. The use of Poison Gas was still to come; so were the cold-blooded murders of Edith Cavell, Mata Hari, Sir Roger Casement and the Dublin Martyrs, Erskine Childers,and countless others.
4) 
P. S. The introduction of Idealism, which left the True Will of the Mongol out of account, has resulted in unrest and anarchy.
5) 
Great achievements of permanent value (other than utilitarian) are evidence of a surplus of wealth & energy. The Temples and Tombs of Egypt and Hindostan; the Dagobas & Pagodas of China, Cambodia, Burma, & Ceylon; the monuments of Assyria,Greece, and Italy; the Masjid of Islam; the Cathedrals, Churches, & Chapels of Initiated Solar-Phallic Mystagogues of the Dark Ages: none such are possible since Power has passed from Prince,Prophet, & Priest to the mindless mass with neither Blood, Insight, nor Control of the Secret Energy of the Universe.
6) 
If every one ceases to call a spade a spade, the term “agricultural implement” soon becomes “bad form.” It has been universally agreed to avoid all reference to the phallus, and so we find sections of society to be horrified at the word “trousers. “Consent to this, and the prude will soon find a new and even remoter object to stir his slime.
8) 
P. S. The apparent ‘Victory’ has made it possible for publicists to make a last desperate attempt to conceal the fact of the practically universal collapse of the pretense that Christianity survives—or ever existed, in any real sense, outside the stews & shambles of serfdom.
9) 
"The World’s Tragedy": concluding passage.






Wednesday, 4 December 2024

Thus Spake Zarathustra Book Study starts this week on Facebook Group Tough Nietzscheans

 We are starting a Book Study of Thus Spake Zarathustra, which will hopefully run until next summer on my Facebook Group called Tough Nietzscheans: 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/toughnietzscheans 

Link:

Tough Nietzscheans

This is a private group and allows free speech.

Please join to participate - please invite others.

Thus Spake Zarathustra [TSZ] Book Study

The Plan:

December - January

INTRODUCTION:

First Three weeks [Post 1]

Ecce Homo: Books/TSZ [sections 1-8]

Second Three weeks

TSZ Prologue [sections 1-10]



February - March

FIRST PART

Third Three weeks [Post 2]

Z Discourses 1 to 11

FourthThree weeks [Post 3]

Z Discourses 12 to 22


April - May

SECOND PART

Fifth Three weeks [Post 4]

Z Discourses 23 to 33

Sixth Three weeks [Post 5]

Z Discourses 34 to 44


June - July

THIRD PART 

Seventh Three weeks [Post 6[

Z Discourses 45 to 55

Eighth Three weeks [Post 7]

Z Discourses 56 to 60



------------------------------------

FAVOURED EDITION: from The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche, ed. Dr Oscar Levy:

Vol XVII - Ecce Homo [translated by A Ludovici] pages 96 - 114

Vol XIII - Thus Spake Zarathustra [translated by Thomas Common] Prologue, First, Second & Third Parts only.





Saturday, 16 November 2024

Thus Spake Odin. Odin's Foreword [after Nietzsche]

THUS SPAKE ODIN 
A Book for All and None 

 First part 

 ODIN'S FOREWORD 

 1. When Odin was thirty years old, he left his home and the lake of his home, and went into the mountains. There he enjoyed his spirit and loneliness, and for ten years did not weary of it. 
But at last his heart changed,— and rising one morn with the rosy dawn, he went before the sun, and spake thus unto him: 
Thou great star! What would thy joy be if thou hadst not those for whom thou shinest! 
For ten years hast thou climbed hither unto my cave: thou wouldst have wearied of thy light and of the journey, had it not been for me, mine eagle, and my serpent. 
But we awaited thee every morn, and took from thee thine overflow and blessed thee for it. 
Lo! my wisdom overburdens me, like the bee that hath gathered too much honey; I need hands outstretched to take it. 
I would fain bestow and distribute, until the wise have once more become blissful in their folly, and the poor joyous in their riches. 
Therefore must I go down into the deep: as thou doest at even, when, sinking behind the sea, thou givest light also to the nether-world, thou overabundant star! 
Like thee must I GO-UNDER, as men say, to whom I shall go down. 
Bless me, then, thou bestilled eye, that canst behold even the greatest bliss without envy! 
Bless the cup that is about to overflow, that the golden water may stream out of it, overwhelming all in the reflection of thy bliss! 
Lo! This cup is again going to empty itself, and Odin is again going to be a man. 
Thus began Odin’s down-going.


2. Odin went down the mountain alone, no one meeting him. When he reached the woods, however, there suddenly stood before him an old man, who had left his holy hut to seek roots. And thus spake the old man to Odin:
“No stranger to me is this wanderer: many years ago passed he by. 
Odin he was called; but he hath changed.
Then thou carriedst thine ashes into the mountains: wilt thou today carry thy fire into the valleys Fearest thou not the fire-starter’s doom?
Yea, I know Odin. Pure is his eye, and no loathing lurketh about his mouth. Goeth he not along like a dancer?
Changed is Odin; a child hath Odin become; an awakened one is Odin: what wilt thou do in the land of the sleepers?
As in the sea hast thou lived in loneliness, and it hath borne thee up. Alas, wilt thou now go on land? Alas, wilt thou again drag thy flesh thyself?”
Odin answered: “I love mankind.”
“Why,” said the holy man, “did I go to the forest and the wilderness? Was it not because I loved mankind over-much?
Now I love God: mankind, I love not. Mankind is a thing too unwholesome for me. Love to mankind would kill me.”
Odin answered: “What spake I of love! I am bringing gifts unto mankind.”
“Give them nothing,” said the holy man. “Take rather part of their load, and bear the burden along with them—that will serve them best: if it only serve thyself well!
And if thou art going to give them aught, give them no more than an alms, and let them also beg for it!”
“No,” replied Odin, “I give no alms. I am not poor enough for that.”
The holy man laughed at Odin, and spake thus: “Then see to it that they accept thy treasures! They are distrustful of anchorites, and do not believe that we come with gifts.
The fall of our footsteps ringeth too hollow through their streets.
And just as at night, when they are in bed and hear a man abroad long before sunrise, so they ask themselves concerning us: Whithergoeth that thief?
Go not to mankind, but tarry in the forest! Go rather to the animals! 
Why not be like me — a bear amongst bears, a bird amongst birds?”
“And what doeth the holy man in the forest?” asked Odin.
The holy man answered: “I make songs and sing them; and in making songs I laugh and weep and mumble: thus do I praise God.
With singing, weeping, laughing, and mumbling do I praise the God who is my God. But what dost thou bring us as a gift?”
When Odin had heard these words, he bowed to the holy man and said: “What should I have to give thee! Let me rather hurry hence lest I take aught away from thee!”—And thus they parted from one another, the old man and Odin, laughing like young boys.
When Odin was alone, however, he said to his heart:
“Could it be possible! This old holy man in the forest hath not yet heard, that GOD IS DEAD!”




Saturday, 12 October 2024

Denazification of Nietzsche is Falsification of Nietzsche

After 1945, the victorious Western Allies sought to "denazify" the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche [1844-1900]. 
Rather than attack the philosopher directly, they attacked via his sister, Elisabeth Forster-Nietzsche [1846-1935] since her life overlapped the Third Reich in Germany. 
The claim was that Elisabeth, who became the editor of her brother's works in the Nietzsche Archive she set up in 1894, had falsified his work, forged texts and letters. 
All this done to explain away the fact that the defeated Axis Powers found inspiration in Nietzsche's works. 
The Allied contention was that the fascists would not have found anything to agree with in Nietzsche if his sister hadn't 'falsified' his work. 

Of course, this was all Allied propaganda in the West [in the East of Europe, the Allies just banned Nietzsche - but the East had little interest in pretending to be liberal]. 
However, it has had the effect of creating a post-war Nietzsche "rehabilitation" industry, which has actually falsified Nietzsche since the 1950s. 

They have done what they accused Elisabeth of doing! 

Here are the result of some exchanges I've had with those who believe the Allied Denazification Propaganda [which seems to be the majority of readers today]: 

Some letters are accused of being faked by Elisabeth, such as January 25, 1888. 

Of course, this letter would be deemed to be "not a letter" in the post war period of de-nazification. Simply because it contradicts the demonisation of Elisabeth. 
Many today, without historical sense, will say yes! Elisabeth forged the letter to contradict the accusation she was a 'nazi' and that her brother hated her for it! 
But think: when that letter was first published, between 1900-09, no one was accusing her of being hated by her brother for being a nazi. No one was accusing her of being a Nazi as the Nazis didn't exist then. This was before WWI *and* WWII. 
So why would she forge such a letter.? 
She had nothing to contradict then. 
She refers to this particular letter during her vast biography of her brother too: 

"In the seventies, when candidates for matrimony were proposed to him [her brother], he demanded above all 'intellectual qualities,' but later on, in the eighties, he would not hear of intellectual ladies as helpmates. In 1888, when I spoke highly of one such lady, he wrote to me: 'for me, much intellect in a woman is still very little, and as a rule this so-called "intellect", which imposes only on superficial men, is simply a piece of absurd pretentiousness. Nothing is more wearisome than an intellectual goose of this sort, who doesn't even know how boring she is ...' ...." 
[Elisabeth Forster-Nietzsche The Lonely Nietzsche, 1913 p 312-3] 

The letter is also in 'Selected Letters of FN;, translated by A Ludovici, edited by Oscar Levy, published in 1921. It wasn't challenged in all that time because Elisabeth had not been scapegoated then. 
I have no reason to doubt the letter. 

On supposedly faked letters in general, ask yourself:  
Was the letter hand-written or typed [Nietzsche sometimes used a typewriter]. 
Did Nietzsche dictate the letter to Gast? 
Is the original extant? 
If not, when did it disappear? 
Was anything stolen from the Nietzsche Archive by Allied troops and plunderers in 1945- ? 

As I said, when she published the letters [1900-9] Nazism didn't exist. Hitler was still a boy then. No one was accusing her of antisemtism then. She had no reason to forge a letter. 
Nor was her position in the Archive in any danger. As Nietzsche's sister, her position was unassailable. She had no need to falsify anything: she was the philosopher's sister - she had the legal right as inheritor. 
She had no motive to falsify anything. 
Her main motive would be to make sure that everything she did for the Archive was above board. 
There is no evidence that Elisabeth falsified anything. 
All editors make mistakes. But a mistake is not a forgery. 

Aren't you suspicious that the accusations come after WWII in the wake of the denazification programme in occupied Germany? 
I have set out my case. Now you set out yours: when were the forgeries 'discovered' and by whom? what kind of forgeries are we talking about? what evidence is there of a forgery? 
Without that evidence and information, I will just assume that the Collected Works that were published at the turn of the 20th Century are the real McCoy as they were not challenged until after the advent of the denazification programme. 

On the section 3 of Wise in the Montinari edition of EH. Did Elisabeth falsify this? 

No - that page was a last minute addition that Nietzsche posted to his printer when he was in the throes of madness. 
Elisabeth was quite open about a loose sheet with a passage of something like this on it. She mentioned it in her great biography of Nietzsche, 1913. 
By all accounts, Nietzsche posted various sheets like this to his printer, as well as the start of his 'letters of madness' on December 30th - 31st, 1888. Four days later he collapsed [4th Jan 1889]. 
When the printer received these sheets in the post for Ecce Homo, Nietzsche had already become insane and they were discounted as being the work of his madness, like his last letters to which they were contemporary. Also, they were not in the right format to have been added to he print run either.

But Elisabeth was still in Paraguay at this time, and so had nothing to do with this. 

She returned to Germany in December 1890. Nevertheless, Elisabeth tells us about all this, and says that on one sheet Nietzsche had made "attacks against my husband, my mother and myself." 
The pages were destroyed, one presumes, by the printer. The printer felt that Ecce Homo [even without the page you refer to] should be held back as the world was not quite ready for it. Overbeck and Elisabeth agreed. 
In 1892 the printer gave the manuscript to Peter Gast. [Elisabeth went back to Paraguay in 1892 to tie up loose ends, returning to Germany for good in 1893] 
Elisabeth published excerpts of the book to test the waters in the ensuing years, finally releasing it as a limited edition in 1908. 

But back to the 'all important' sheet that was said to be destroyed. Miraculously, the communist Montinari [who began a new critical edition of Nietzche in the 1950s as appointed by the anti-Nietzschean East German authorities], "found" the destroyed sheets in 1969. 
How convenient! 
Given that Elisabeth described the sheets years before, it would be easy to conjure them up years later when all those involved - Elisabeth, Gast, Overbeck, the printer Naumann, are dead. 
The story was that Gast held on to the sheets, and they were discovered by Montinari in his literary remains. Gast died in 1918. 

Even if these are the actual sheets, they should be viewed as writings of Nietzsche's insanity, like his last letters. 
And if they really are the sheets, then it proves that Elisabeth didn't destroy them! 
Nor did Elisabeth hide their content as she referred to them in her book on her brother of 1913. 

Once again, Elisabeth is being slandered for no reason at all. The sheets are back in certain editions if people want them. Elisabeth didn't destroy them and referred to them in her book on Nietzsche published in 1913. 
Also, in the last days of his madness and final collapse, Nietzsche wrote many strange things about many other people. This has no bearing on Nietzsche's relationship with Elisabeth when he was sane. What's the issue? Why does Elisabeth have to take all this? 
Without her we wouldn't have Ecce Homo! 

 Don't Karl Schlechta and Mazzino Montinaro claim that Elisabeth was a forger? 

 Karl Schlecta was a member of the Nazi Party who worked at the Nietzsche Archive in the 1930s. He was an active and enthusiastic Nazi. 
So why doesn't he also get accused of being a nazi antisemite? 
Is it because after the war he denigrated Elisabeth, and somehow managed to create his own edition of Nietzsche's works to replace the Nietzsche Archive edition? 
How did a Nazi thrive in occupied Germany during denazification? 
I think we can see the agenda a mile off. 

In Italy we have an active Communist Party member, Montinari, making a new Italian edition of Nietzsche's Collected works! Once again, just after WWII. 
Notice a pattern yet? 
Of course these imposters will claim that the edition they are replacing is "faked"! Just as Kaufmann and Hollingdale did in the English speaking world after WWII. 
Same patter, same scam. 

So why can't you answer my questions about the letter? You are just repeating what the establishment tells you is true, but without knowing why. Here are the questions again: 
when were the forgeries 'discovered' and by whom? 
what kind of forgeries are we talking about? 
what evidence is there of a forgery? 

But isn't the modern view that Elisabeth was a forger? 

 Absolute lack of evidence. Where is the evidence that Elisabeth "falsified" her brother's work? 
She was Nietzsche's heir as his closest relative and carer! She had no need to justify that: it was a legal absolute. 
Of course I have looked at the accusations: they are baseless. 
That's why you can't assert them in your own words. 

The coup was the Denazification programme. Schlechta, Montinari and Kaufmann all rode in on the tails of that programme. Although they called it "rehabilitation", as though Nietzsche was a criminal serving his sentence in a soft prison. 
The pre-war editions which were true to Nietzsche's principles, had to be replaced by 'rehabilitated' democratic, liberal, socialist friendly editions. 
And yet in the English speaking world, for example, the pre-war Levy edition [authorised by Elisabeth] is still in print [albeit piecemeal now] because it is superior to the parasitic denazification editions of Kaufman, Hollingdale etc. 

Levy and his translators were all Nietzscheans - Zimmern was a friend of Nietzsche. But Kaufman, Hollingdale - like Montinari - were all anti-Nietzscheans. 
Elisabeth didn't falsify her brother's work - she *saved* her brothers work! 
Thanks to her we have The Collected Works of Friedrich Nietzsche. 

The Nietzsche Archive was founded in 1894, its founder and chief Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche [died 1935]. The Archive in Weimar was, until the end of the Second World War, a location of central importance for Nietzsche's reception in Germany. 
After WWII Weimar was part of East Germany [GDR]. The Nietzsche Archive was formally dissolved in 1956. Its holdings were made accessible for western researchers, most notably the Italian Communist Mazzino Montinari, who replaced the Archiv's Nietzsche editions with new ones. 
In the GDR, however, Nietzsche was still a forbidden author, with all of his works being banned. 

So while West Germany [and therefore The West] sought to "rehabilitate" Nietzsche, East Germany banned Nietzsche because the Communist authorities recognised Nietzsche as a precursor to Nazism. Both East and west had one thing in common: Elisabeth was to be a scapegoat. 
With the fall of the Soviet Union and the reunification of Germany, the rehabilitated Nietzsche wins. But that is not the real Nietzsche. 
The real Nietzsche is Elisabeth's Nietzsche: the Nietzsche of the Weimar Archive. 

The falsification of Nietzsche occurred *after* 1945. 
Any mainstream editions of Nietzsche published after 1945 are falsifications. 
The true editions are those published before 1935. 
Post-1945 "rehabilitation" = falsification. 

 Nietzsche went insane in early 1889 after putting his final book Ecce Homo to the printer in late 1888. Elisabeth was still in Paraguay then. In those days it took three months for a letter to get from Germany to Paraguay. 
Elisabeth returned to Germany in 1890 by which time Nietzsche was insane and unable to write anything. Elisabeth returned to Paraguay in 1892 to tie up any lose ends. Elisabeth returned to Germany in 1893. 
During that period of 1888 to 1893, Nietzsche's mother, Overbeck, Gast, Naumann et al had access to Nietzsche's work. To apply some order to her brother's material, Elisabeth formed the Nietzsche Archive in 1894. 
Due to her offices, Nietzsche's work was gradually put under one roof and some order applied to it. She worked tirelessly. Many of the great intellectuals of the time flocked to the Archive, Heidegger and Thomas Mann amongst them. Nietzsche's mother died in 1897. 

In 1921, Jena University awarded Elisabeth an honorary doctorate (h.c., or honoris causae) 

For a woman in that era, her achievements were immense and inspired Martin Heidegger's massive work and lectures on Nietzsche in the 1930s. 
Elisabeth died in 1935 but the Archive carried on. 
At the end of World War Two, defeated Germany was subject to a denazification programme. The Archive was in the eastern part of the occupation, where Nietzsche's works were actually banned. In the post-war period the campaign to paint Elisabeth as a falsifier of Nietzsche's work was begun as part of that denazification programme.. 
The woman who had been lauded by the great intellectuals of the pre-war period and given an honorary degree, was now the victim of scapegoating propaganda. 
Still today, useful idiots - who haven't read a word that Elisabeth wrote - parrot this propaganda. 

But the joke is this: her editions are still the best. The post war editions have the fingers of democrats, liberals, socialists, anarchists, egalitarians and feminists all over them. Nietzsche would have smelt their decay. To get the true Nietzsche, don't touch anything of Nietzsche's done after 1935 [the year of Elisabeth's death]. 

Someone claims there are "sources" - such as Peter Gast - which prove that Elisabeth was a forger. 

There are two sources in Nietzschean philosophy: 
You and Nietzsche. 
If you can't put things in your own words or Nietzsche's words, then you have no sources. 
You are literally resourceless. 
You are not Peter Gast, Peter Gast is not Nietzsche. Gast [real name Heinrich Koselltz] too has been accused of 'doctoring' Nietzsche's w8ritings, so why do you trust him? 
Gast fell out with Elisabeth and had an axe to grind. He cannot therefore be considered a source in relation to this issue. What you post above is little more than spiteful gossip. It proves nothing. 
Why would you use a man with Gast's reputation? 

A philosopher wanting to prove something false would follow the basic dictum: who, what, when, where and why? Show a passage you think Elisabeth falsified. Quote it from the real source [Nietzsche]. Then tell me how it was falsified. 
Tittle-tattle from former disgruntled employees is not a source. 
Nietzsche is the source. You are your own source. 
Speak in your own words if you know no Nietzsche. 

The fact is that Nietzsche's most important books were published by him during his lifetime, from The Birth of Tragedy to The Twilight of the Idols. 
From this vast range of authenticated publications we can assess the posthumous works, notebooks and so forth. It isn't that difficult. 
So let's see your own evidence - in your words or Nietzsche's. If you can. 

 The great irony in all this is that Elisabeth fell out with others in the Archive because she was so scrupulous about keeping everything exact and genuine. She shared this trait, like many others, with her brother, who drove his publishers insane with a similar fastidiousness. 
And those she upset by this [as most are] even tried to forge 'drafts' of Nietzsche 'letters' to wound her. 
Yes, it was Elisabeth's refusal to 'falsify' Nietzsche that made her enemies. 
Of course it is a typical black propaganda technique to turn a target's own virtues against them in reverse fashion. 
Elisabeth the scrupulous would be accused of being unscrupulous! Ridiculous! 
But that's how the traditional enemies of the truth always work. 

But she left enough in her own writings for us to know that she was always on the side of her brother, and did all she could to make sure his work would remain for posterity. 
As this era of ugly 'rehabilitation' draws to a close, and the work of the original Archive once more comes into sharp focus, we who know the genius of Nietzsche will steadfastly reject the lies of the slanderers and the plunderers and the usurpers. 
Elisabeth, like the Persian, spake the truth, and aimed straight 

Just as the denazification of Nietzsche after 1945 dawned on me: - 'rehabilitation' in the West, and banning in the East ... 
Just as the real and deceptive characters of Schlechta, Montinari, Kaufmann and Hollingdale et al, came to light - after very little digging ... 
Another revelation hove into view:

Around the same time, the early 1950s, was published the forgery, 'My Sister and I'. 
Now it all made sense. 
In the West they attack Nietzsche through his sister. Published by the criminal Samuel Roth, 
'My Sister and I' was part of a clearly orchestrated campaign to smear Elisabeth and Fritz. 
Kaufmann's rebuttal of the book was done to make him look like the leading Nietzsche scholar, while stoking controversy about a book that should be ignored by all scholars. 
Once I looked into Roth and the others involved in that fake, I saw the same pattern: accuse your victim of being what you are. 

But Elisabeth is innocent: it is her accusers who are the falsfiers and the fakers.