I would say;1) All cultures/races/mythic histories think they are superior to all others ... if they are HEALTHY.This is why the liberal screaming about the horror of 'white supremacy' is so nauseating - ALL races, white, black, brown, yellow and red, think they are superior. If they don't, then they are suffering depression, decline, and have lost the Will to Live/survive.

2) All history is subjective (less subjective/more objective just means more or less decadent). Therefore if your history is AFFIRMATIVE - e.g., British Kiplingesque history of the Victorian Era, or DECADENT - eg., modern politically correct Western anti-white history, then it exhibits your subjective state. Do you, as in the former, demonstrate STRONG WILL, or as in the latter, WEAK WILL.

3) There is no 'truth', only perspectival interpretations.


This is the point of the 'Use and Abuse of History for Life'.

Culture, History, and Mythology (all of them intertwined), are the result of the creative Will. Therefore the Greek aristocracy (like all other Blond Beasts) believed themselves to be descended from the gods; and of what other use are gods to the Noblilty?Gods only rule and punish the slaves, the people without Race.

You can psychologise this tendency of the Masters, but it ultimately derives from optimum Will to Power, a power which then can permeate the culture, slaves and all. However, when the slaves revolt, and overthrow the Nobility, then begins the decline into what you call 'more objective' history; a negative Nihilistic mythology, a self hating agenda - what Nietzsche calls the 'Slave Revolt in Morality'.

Remeber that Affirmative Culture has only been created by the Master Races of the earth, and this applies to the Aryans, as well as to the Arabs, and the Japanese nobility; the undifferentiated pre-noble mass has created nothing; it has only emulated the culture of its Masters, and then gradually debased it.

Nietzsche puts forward the means for a Noble cultural palingenesis; this is why he affirms Aryan culture.