Posts
1
The Dominant 5%.
The liberal view holds that it is an 'unjust' state of affairs for a minority to 'control' the majority.
Similarly it is 'unfair' that a minority 'own' the majority of resources etc.,
By this view also, religion is merely a means by which a minority [priests etc.,] control the masses.
But liberals miss the most important point of all;
It is the majority that WANT to be controlled; they WANT to be led and to have their decisions made for them.
In return, this majority reap the reward of community, identity etc., and are able to concentrate on the minutiae of their lives.
It seems that this is the natural order of things.
Even more, the majority demand that this minority, who I'll call the 'dominant 5%' [D5%] lead them: it is almost as if this D5% evolved by some kind of evolutionary need and pressure.
This is the Necessity of Leadership.
The liberal notion that the majority are somehow 'oppressed' by the D5%, and that all they need to do is 'throw off their chains', is then very far from reality.
Of course, the D5% do take advantage: they do this because they are often 'Blond Beasts'. And even though modern societal organisations seek to safeguard against the D5% from 'abusing their position', it cannot be denied that the D5% are always Necessary.
2
The Art of Being Ruled.
I say that there should always be a degree of distance between the minority who rule and those majority who are ruled.
This is so that the ruled can learn the Necessity and Pride of obedience.
If it so, that a roughly D5% always emerges from any group, then the larger the group, the wider the pool of potential Leaders.
This creates a problem in groups of large populations as there is ultimately only one top job.
Every Leader knows this.
So, in large groups, Collectivist ideals have naturally evolved. This in effect shrinks the percentage of possible leaders available and schools the majority in positive obedience.
So, in countries with traditionally large populations [obvious example is China] this collectivist ideal and will to obedience emerges.
Of course, excessive collectivism, as in China, is undesirable, and is as much against Arayanism as is excessive individualism.
A balance is needed.
This suggests that the reason for the USA's severe social problems are due to her complete lack of Collectivist Ideals - indeed, the USA has an extreme propensity for the opposite.
Because of the heightened Individualism of USA culture, her vast population gives out too many frustrated 'leaders', none of them able to nail the 'top job'.
Frustrated leaders malfunction and go bad - they aberrate; they also poison the whole atmosphere as idle hands.
Hence the proliferation of Cults, serial killers, criminal gangs etc.,
This is why Europe must always keep sight of its socialist aspects and balance them with individualism.
This was done in fascism/N-S, where the Leadership Principle satsified the D5% ideal, and the Folk tradition satisfied the social ideal.
Leader/Folk was the dynamic for European political evolution.
Of course, this was destroyed by the USA model which now tries to force Europe down its own road of inter-national atomisation.
If Europe is ever united along the USA lines, then its social fabric will be rent in a fashion even more nightmarish than that of the Americans.
Therefore, National-Socialism still provides the basis for a future European Folk Community, with its Necessity of Leadership by the D5%, and its majority of obedient kindred.
The Dominant 5%.
The liberal view holds that it is an 'unjust' state of affairs for a minority to 'control' the majority.
Similarly it is 'unfair' that a minority 'own' the majority of resources etc.,
By this view also, religion is merely a means by which a minority [priests etc.,] control the masses.
But liberals miss the most important point of all;
It is the majority that WANT to be controlled; they WANT to be led and to have their decisions made for them.
In return, this majority reap the reward of community, identity etc., and are able to concentrate on the minutiae of their lives.
It seems that this is the natural order of things.
Even more, the majority demand that this minority, who I'll call the 'dominant 5%' [D5%] lead them: it is almost as if this D5% evolved by some kind of evolutionary need and pressure.
This is the Necessity of Leadership.
The liberal notion that the majority are somehow 'oppressed' by the D5%, and that all they need to do is 'throw off their chains', is then very far from reality.
Of course, the D5% do take advantage: they do this because they are often 'Blond Beasts'. And even though modern societal organisations seek to safeguard against the D5% from 'abusing their position', it cannot be denied that the D5% are always Necessary.
2
The Art of Being Ruled.
I say that there should always be a degree of distance between the minority who rule and those majority who are ruled.
This is so that the ruled can learn the Necessity and Pride of obedience.
If it so, that a roughly D5% always emerges from any group, then the larger the group, the wider the pool of potential Leaders.
This creates a problem in groups of large populations as there is ultimately only one top job.
Every Leader knows this.
So, in large groups, Collectivist ideals have naturally evolved. This in effect shrinks the percentage of possible leaders available and schools the majority in positive obedience.
So, in countries with traditionally large populations [obvious example is China] this collectivist ideal and will to obedience emerges.
Of course, excessive collectivism, as in China, is undesirable, and is as much against Arayanism as is excessive individualism.
A balance is needed.
This suggests that the reason for the USA's severe social problems are due to her complete lack of Collectivist Ideals - indeed, the USA has an extreme propensity for the opposite.
Because of the heightened Individualism of USA culture, her vast population gives out too many frustrated 'leaders', none of them able to nail the 'top job'.
Frustrated leaders malfunction and go bad - they aberrate; they also poison the whole atmosphere as idle hands.
Hence the proliferation of Cults, serial killers, criminal gangs etc.,
This is why Europe must always keep sight of its socialist aspects and balance them with individualism.
This was done in fascism/N-S, where the Leadership Principle satsified the D5% ideal, and the Folk tradition satisfied the social ideal.
Leader/Folk was the dynamic for European political evolution.
Of course, this was destroyed by the USA model which now tries to force Europe down its own road of inter-national atomisation.
If Europe is ever united along the USA lines, then its social fabric will be rent in a fashion even more nightmarish than that of the Americans.
Therefore, National-Socialism still provides the basis for a future European Folk Community, with its Necessity of Leadership by the D5%, and its majority of obedient kindred.
II
Stray thoughts on the D5%
The effect of collectivity - the group mind. Observe any crowd [a rock concert crowd, or a religious meeting of zealots, or a soccer crowd etc.,] and you will see the individuals taken over and act according to the group mind. Clearly, in these cases the 'final decision' rests with the crowd; in such a milieu, individuals do and say things they never would when alone.
I do not accept the notion of 'free-will', which is why I couch my ideas in terms of Necesssity.
Slavery [of a kind] is Necessary to humanity.
When 'slave resentment' becomes political, it creates Communism, Anarchism and Nihilism.
Mankind has always/is always ruled by elites.
A good example is that of POWs.
I do not accept the notion of 'free-will', which is why I couch my ideas in terms of Necesssity.
Slavery [of a kind] is Necessary to humanity.
When 'slave resentment' becomes political, it creates Communism, Anarchism and Nihilism.
Mankind has always/is always ruled by elites.
A good example is that of POWs.
POW guards always obeserve their prisoners [necessarily held in large groups in POW camps] and wait for the natural leaders to emerge [the D5%].
These leaders are the ones who will instil rebellion, will devise escapes, will foment revolt.
The guards then remove the leaders and isolate them as trouble-makers. After that is done, the POW group is completely passive and will never do anything other than obey.
On this basis must there be Distance between rulers and ruled [castes].
This is organic in itself - it is the Order of Rank.
These leaders are the ones who will instil rebellion, will devise escapes, will foment revolt.
The guards then remove the leaders and isolate them as trouble-makers. After that is done, the POW group is completely passive and will never do anything other than obey.
On this basis must there be Distance between rulers and ruled [castes].
This is organic in itself - it is the Order of Rank.
National-Socilaism is not a cult, but a world-wide political/spiritual ideology.
To control millions you have to convince them that they have 'free-will'.
To control millions you have to convince them that they have 'free-will'.
It is said that in a crowd the average IQ plummets as the group-mind takes over.
Being 'swept along in the crowd' is the group mind - it is an easily observable phenomena.
A HEALTHY Folk produces Leaders [sign of decadence;- weak leaders]; those Leaders have an OBLIGATION to the Folk just as the Folk has an OBLIGATION to their Leaders.
A HEALTHY Folk produces Leaders [sign of decadence;- weak leaders]; those Leaders have an OBLIGATION to the Folk just as the Folk has an OBLIGATION to their Leaders.
This enhances growth and it furthers culture and achievement; it expresses Identity and Solidarity, and gives the guidelines to the pursuit of Honour.
According to the Racial/Cultural/Spiritual bias of the Folk, those who seek to harm/undermine/infect this criteria must be dealt with by legal punishments as set out in the Folk Nation's constitution up to and including the power over life & death.
'Slave Resentment' is the will to power of the non-Aryan slaves as they spit their hatred at their Aryan masters. They completely reverse the values of Aryan morality; anarchism is just one example of this reversal of Aryan values.
If they lack the will-to-leadership and are not among the D5% by definition.
I am pointing to the Necessity of Domination.
Ancient Greece/Rome/Medieval, Renaissance Europe etc.,
According to the Racial/Cultural/Spiritual bias of the Folk, those who seek to harm/undermine/infect this criteria must be dealt with by legal punishments as set out in the Folk Nation's constitution up to and including the power over life & death.
'Slave Resentment' is the will to power of the non-Aryan slaves as they spit their hatred at their Aryan masters. They completely reverse the values of Aryan morality; anarchism is just one example of this reversal of Aryan values.
If they lack the will-to-leadership and are not among the D5% by definition.
I am pointing to the Necessity of Domination.
Ancient Greece/Rome/Medieval, Renaissance Europe etc.,
These eras are characterised by Aristocratic rule and High Culture - the very D5% I am speaking of.
As Nietzsche said, civilisation is a means to produce just a Few Higher Men; the mass of begging hordes can have their 'petitions' - the most important thing is that a Race is able to provide the scaffolding upon which a Higher Culture can climb.
Removing and isolating the natural leaders from a POW group is a tried and tested method of quelling rebellion.
Dominant characteristics are fairly easy to spot, especially as the majority of men are passive.
Future Genetics etc., may lead to a way of determining the D5% in an even more "clear cut" way.
Hierarchy is central to Aryan Culture, as is the notion of Caste.
A cult becomes a religion if it is able to survive and establish itself after the death of its leaders as Christianity has done [of course, Mormonism is a Christian heresy which began very recently as a cult].
Removing and isolating the natural leaders from a POW group is a tried and tested method of quelling rebellion.
Dominant characteristics are fairly easy to spot, especially as the majority of men are passive.
Future Genetics etc., may lead to a way of determining the D5% in an even more "clear cut" way.
Hierarchy is central to Aryan Culture, as is the notion of Caste.
A cult becomes a religion if it is able to survive and establish itself after the death of its leaders as Christianity has done [of course, Mormonism is a Christian heresy which began very recently as a cult].
Hitlerism itself was a cultish aspect of National-Socialism, although N-S itself was primarily a political ideology which pre-dated Hitler.
So while Hitler was the Leader of the German people, he was not analogous to Jesus in Christianity or to Joseph Smith in Mormonism.
Although with the passing of Hitler, the cultish aspect known as Hitlerism becomes a religious form [see the work of Savitri Devi etc.,].
George Lincoln Rockwell was wrong to use so many delinquents in his movement - one of them ended up killing him.
The grounds for the Leadership Principle are inherent in the natural hierarchy of the Folk, which is not an equalised mob, but an organic entity with separate FUNCTIONS based on the Order of Rank.
Although with the passing of Hitler, the cultish aspect known as Hitlerism becomes a religious form [see the work of Savitri Devi etc.,].
George Lincoln Rockwell was wrong to use so many delinquents in his movement - one of them ended up killing him.
The grounds for the Leadership Principle are inherent in the natural hierarchy of the Folk, which is not an equalised mob, but an organic entity with separate FUNCTIONS based on the Order of Rank.
At the top is the Leader who actually serves the interest of the Race by producing Greatness.
'free-will' is the tool of Christianity to justify the notion of 'sin' [you supposedly 'chose' to do wrong/right (cutting both ways)].
'free-will' is the tool of Christianity to justify the notion of 'sin' [you supposedly 'chose' to do wrong/right (cutting both ways)].
One's Racial inheritance and attendant Strength of Will [strong, not 'free']is the determining factor, not a SUPERFLUOUS 'free-will' which cannot even be demonstrated by its apologists.
I want the Aryan State to subjugate the Money Power to the Racial State.
The 'group mind' can work constructively to sort out problems or make discoveries [hundreth monkey syndrome].
Everything that is has a sufficient reason to be rather than not be - that is its necessity.
Cosmos=Order; that is what Aryan man seeks to impose on the world of Chaos.
It is not necessary to worship Hitler to be a National Socialist [whereas one MUST worship Christ to be a Christian].
Deracinated populations are unhealthy per se.
The Friend/Enemy distinction is basic to the Political [cf., Carl Schmitt].
Everything that is has a sufficient reason to be rather than not be - that is its necessity.
Cosmos=Order; that is what Aryan man seeks to impose on the world of Chaos.
It is not necessary to worship Hitler to be a National Socialist [whereas one MUST worship Christ to be a Christian].
Deracinated populations are unhealthy per se.
The Friend/Enemy distinction is basic to the Political [cf., Carl Schmitt].
No political movement can be without struggle, conflict and conquest.
What of all the European nations is the 'dominant 5%'?
If Europe needs such a D5% in order to form a unit, then who will it be?
Are the Germans and the English exhausted now and without the self-belief necessary for all D5%s?
If Europe needs such a D5% in order to form a unit, then who will it be?
Are the Germans and the English exhausted now and without the self-belief necessary for all D5%s?
No comments:
Post a Comment